Comments on: Non-recursive automake http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/ Ramblings on computers… Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:19:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Robert Collins http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-763 Robert Collins Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:51:46 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-763 targets with no body just add dependencys. E.g. .PHONY: foo .PHONY: bar is equivalent to .PHONY: foo bar targets with no body just add dependencys. E.g.
.PHONY: foo
.PHONY: bar
is equivalent to
.PHONY: foo bar

]]> By: Philip Withnall http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-757 Philip Withnall Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:38:55 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-757 Ooh, thanks. I didn't know we had automated lcov testing going on; that's quite useful to know. Unfortunately, the build bots are using libgdata 0.4.0, which is a bit out of date now. I should probably get around to asking for an external dependency version bump for libgdata sometime. Ooh, thanks.

I didn't know we had automated lcov testing going on; that's quite useful to know. Unfortunately, the build bots are using libgdata 0.4.0, which is a bit out of date now. I should probably get around to asking for an external dependency version bump for libgdata sometime.

]]> By: Javier Jardón http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-755 Javier Jardón Wed, 30 Dec 2009 02:07:11 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-755 Hello Philip, Thank you for this blog post, very interesting. I've added libgdata to my list of projects using no recursive automake: http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/NewBuildSystem . Hope you don't mind Also, maybe you already know, but you can see the coverage of your code here: http://fixed.gnome.org/coverage/libgdata/lcov/ and the status of the build here: http://build.gnome.org/libgdata Regards Hello Philip,

Thank you for this blog post, very interesting. I've added libgdata to my list of projects using no recursive automake: http://live.gnome.org/JavierJardon/NewBuildSystem . Hope you don't mind

Also, maybe you already know, but you can see the coverage of your code here: http://fixed.gnome.org/coverage/libgdata/lcov/ and the status of the build here: http://build.gnome.org/libgdata

Regards

]]> By: foo http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-754 foo Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:23:58 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-754 It would be great if automake would generate gcov makefile targets! It would be great if automake would generate gcov makefile targets!

]]> By: Philip Withnall http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-753 Philip Withnall Wed, 30 Dec 2009 01:08:40 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-753 Good catch. I'd meant to change that before committing, but forgot. Now I've got the problem of having .PHONY twice in my Makefile though, and I don't want to combine them because that would be messy. Humph. Good catch. I'd meant to change that before committing, but forgot. Now I've got the problem of having .PHONY twice in my Makefile though, and I don't want to combine them because that would be messy. Humph.

]]> By: Daniel Elstner http://tecnocode.co.uk/2009/12/29/non-recursive-automake/comment-page-1/#comment-752 Daniel Elstner Tue, 29 Dec 2009 22:30:17 +0000 http://tecnocode.co.uk/?p=304#comment-752 I think it has to be spelled .PHONY: :-) I think it has to be spelled .PHONY: :-)

]]>